| 张刘龙,曹能秀.比较教育学实证主义和相对主义分析框架的比较及启示[J].陕西学前师范学院学报,2017,33(11):40-43 |
| 比较教育学实证主义和相对主义分析框架的比较及启示 |
| Comparison and Enlightenment of Comparative and Analytical Framework of Positivism and Relativism |
| 投稿时间：2017-04-26 修订日期：2017-07-05 |
| DOI：10.11995/j.issn.2095-770X.2017.11.009 |
| 中文关键词: 比较教育学 实证主义 相对主义 分析框架 启示 |
| 英文关键词: comparative education positivism relativism analytical framework enlightenment |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1448 |
| 全文下载次数: 1763 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 理论分析框架的整合不仅是比较教育学理论发展的基础路径，也是当代比较教育研究不断完善自身体系的价值追求。比较教育研究中的两大理论分析框架——实证主义和相对主义，前者强调运用科学实证的研究方法概括出整个教育系统的一般普遍规律，后者侧重采用本土化的研究方法为特定教育对象的发展提供决策服务。二者的比较加强了比较教育学的理论与实践的结合，有利于建立包容、系统的理论分析框架，并不断促进比较教育研究体系的整合。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The integration of theoretical analysis framework is not only the basic path of the development of comparative education theory, but also the value pursuit of contemporary comparative education research. The two main theoretical frameworks of comparative education research - positivism and relativism, the former emphasizes the use of scientific and empirical research methods to summarize the general law of the whole education system; the latter focuses on the use of localized research methods for specific educational objects development to provide decision-making services. The comparison between the two strengthens the combination of theory and practice of comparative education, establishes the framework of theoretical analysis of inclusive and systematic, and continuously promotes the integration of comparative education research system. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
