文章摘要
潘小慧.儿童读经”与“儿童哲学”大不同——从伦理教育理念看儿童读经与儿童哲学[J].陕西学前师范学院学报,2018,34(10):1-4
儿童读经”与“儿童哲学”大不同——从伦理教育理念看儿童读经与儿童哲学
The Huge Differences between“Children’s Classic Reading” and “Philosophy for Children”—From the Perspective of Ethics Education
投稿时间:2018-08-30  修订日期:2018-09-30
DOI:10.11995/j.issn.2095-770X.2018.10.001
中文关键词: 儿童读经  儿童哲学  伦理教育
英文关键词: Key words: children’s classic reading  philosophy for children  ethics education
基金项目:
作者单位
潘小慧 (辅仁大学哲学系 台湾新北) 
摘要点击次数: 1026
全文下载次数: 764
中文摘要:
      “儿童读经”与语言教育、文化教育、伦理教育各有某种关连,后三者之间亦两两互有关连但是却呈现不同内涵。在一般意义上,“儿童哲学”可以视为哲学的一个分支领域,然而在严格意义上,可以说是针对儿童的哲学训练。本文重点专注于从伦理教育理念来阐明:“儿童读经”或“儿童哲学”是否是一个好的或有效的伦理教育方式?且这两者之间到底有何差异?基本结论是:“儿童读经”与伦理教育的关联不大,儿童哲学由于强调思考与讨论,在伦理教育方面主要能提供伦理思考的面向,协助伦理教育知、情、意、行之“知”的培育部分。
英文摘要:
      “Children’s Classic Reading” has certain relations with language teaching, cultural education and ethics education. The latter three aspects are also related to each other but with different connotations. Generally, the “philosophy for children” is a branch of philosophy study, which can be taken as a sort of philosophical training for children. The paper probes to whether “Children’s Classic Reading” or “Philosophy for Children” is a good or an effective way of ethics education and the differences between the two concepts, from the perspective of ideas in ethics education. It concludes that “Children’s Classic Reading” has little to do with ethics education, and since “Philosophy for Children” puts emphasis on thinking and discussion, it can provide directions for ethical thinking and can contributes to the training of “cognition” from the perspective of ethics education.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮