张凯莉.试论“重写文学史”对当下文学史写作的意义[J].陕西学前师范学院学报,2016,32(9):87-90 |
试论“重写文学史”对当下文学史写作的意义 |
On the Significance of “Rewriting Literary History” to the Writing of Contemporary Literature History |
投稿时间:2016-04-11 |
DOI:10.11995/j.issn.2095-770X.2016.09.019 |
中文关键词: 历史经验主义 政治与审美 反思 |
英文关键词: Historical empiricism Politics and aesthetics reflection |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 1972 |
全文下载次数: 1263 |
中文摘要: |
“重写文学史”是在陈思和、王晓明等人推动下产生,他们对以往的文学史著作提出了个种不同问题。“重写文学史”主要针对以往重要作家作品定论分析质疑与重评。尤其是针对从解放区文学到“十七年文学”重要作家作品的既定结论的重评。从开设的专栏对赵树理、柳青、茅盾等作家作品的重评就能体会到重评“十七年文学”的“拨乱反正”意味,对我们当下的文学史认识以及新的文学史书写仍然具有十分重要的借鉴意义。 |
英文摘要: |
“Rewriting Literature History” is produced under the impetus of Chen Sihe, Wang Xiaoming , and they have put forward a kind of different question to the previous literature history work. “Rewriting the history of literature” is mainly aimed at the conclusion of the previous critical writers' works.Especially the re evaluation of the established conclusions of the important writers' works from the Jiefang District literature to the “Seventeen Year Literature”.From the column set up on writers and works of Zhao Shuli, Liu Qing, Mao Dun, and other rating can experience to a reappraisal of the literature of “seventeen years” of “bringing order out of chaos” means. However, it has a very important role in our understanding of the history of literature and new literature history writing.It is of great significance to the history of literature and history of literature history reflective attitude and perception of literary history writing standard. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |