| 陈莉.《人生》距离悲剧经典有多远——从高加林的人生“悲剧”看路遥创作的局限性[J].陕西学前师范学院学报,2016,32(3):45-48 |
| 《人生》距离悲剧经典有多远——从高加林的人生“悲剧”看路遥创作的局限性 |
| How LIFE is farway from the tragical classic——from Gao Jialin ’S tragedy of life to discover the finiteness of Lu Yao |
| 投稿时间：2015-05-25 修订日期：2015-06-27 |
| DOI：10.11995/j.issn.2095-770X.2016.03.013 |
| 中文关键词: 悲剧 爱的本质 身份使命 路遥 |
| 英文关键词: Tragedy Nature of Love Identity and Mission Lu Yao |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2002 |
| 全文下载次数: 1328 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 《人生》作为八十年代之初的畅销书，时过境迁后能否成为经典作品？仔细阅读作品，发现《人生》在心理描写、爱的本质、身份使命的思考方面都存在明显的局限性，路遥与同时期作家高晓声、与现实主义大师陀思妥耶夫斯基、与现代主义作家米兰·昆德拉还存在较大的差距。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| As one of the best sellers in early 1980s, would the book LIFE still be a classic in the future? By reading attentively, it is obvious that there are limitations in the book LIFE on psychological description, nature of love, thoughts of identity and mission.Huge differences are existing between Lu Yao and other writers in the same time period such as Gao Xiaosheng; Dostoyevsky, the master of realism; and Milan Kundera, the modernist writer. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
